QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 24 2011, 02:16 PM)

How the heck did you manage to have "BOOT.INI" choices on the Windows 7 disk?

You should have at the most "BCD" choices, and one of them should be Windows 7.
I believe this IS the first I recall your using this term "BCD", but I could be wrong.

I didn't know what you meant by this
then, but I do
now.QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 30 2011, 10:37 AM)

There are NO (and this is the
nTH time I tell you this

) "Win 7 BOOT.INI choices", there is actually NO file called BOOT.INI (or there SHOULD NOT be) on your internal disk, nor a NTLDR (which reads BOOT.INI and choices in it).
This, then, would be TWICE that "BCD" was implied or that Win 7 doesn't actually have "boot.ini choices". Maybe we could agree on simply "boot choices"?
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 31 2011, 10:47 AM)

You CANNOT have more than one Extended partition.
You can have as many logical volumes inside the 1 and ONLY Extended partition.
One (or more) of these logical volumes can be "dedicated" to Linux Ubuntu, one to Puppy Linux, etc.
Installing TWO Linuxes on the SAME logical volume is STRONGLY NOT advised.
The difference between the screen pic of Disk Mgmt in
Post #12 and the one I am posting here show clearly, primary partitions vs. logical ones AND neither of which having anything to do with XP (obviously XP is there in first, primary partition, but I'm referring to the Ubuntu install or Linux, in general).
This, as you state, IS exactly what I *thought* I understood from your previous "lessons", but then confusing my *extended* with my *Ext2/Ext3/Ext4* partition vs. file systems got me ALL tangled up. Just when I thought I understood my mistake and went back to my original understanding, you guys mixed me up all over again by pounding it into my head that I was NOT allowed to install Ubuntu AND Puppy on/in the same place. I don't know why anyone would
want to install, say, Puppy, on the
same "logical" drive, so I cannot say, but *I* certainly
never proposed doing so. As if things weren't screwy enough, huh? So NOW noted:
- XP -- 1st PRIMARY partition on new disk
- ONE extended PARTITION created for Linux on new disk
- Ubuntu -- 7th LOGICAL volume (in the ONE extended partition) on new disk (with it's added logical volumes 5th and 6th, i.e., "/boot" and "/linux-swap")
- FUTURE Puppy -- nth LOGICAL volume (in the ONE extended partition) on new disk (with it's possible added logical volumes yet to be named)
OK -- I don't know why it started logical volume numbering at "5", but there are no other logical volumes (created by ME) other than what I just mapped out.
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 31 2011, 10:47 AM)

If you have a BOOTMGR and a BCD you get to BCD choices.
This field as you should have learned by now revolves mostly about EXACTness of both reports and instructions.
Speaking of "BCD" (now that I recall where I first heard of this) I had originally thought about EasyBCD for use with XP and Ubuntu (well
before coming to this forum) until further reading lead me
HERE and to the following about my version:
QUOTE
Due to a bug in Ubuntu 10.04+, the current steps are rather more convoluted than they used to be in previous versions, requiring the user to first give control of the MBR to GRUB2, and then use EasyBCD to put the Windows bootloader back in control. We have brought this issue to the attention of the Ubuntu developers, and hope to have it resolved soon.
If this can "clean up" the issue about letting Linux installer have it's way with XP's MBR, then maybe this is a different way to go? No, I am NOT trying to make things
harder OR trying to
cut corners , as you say, but rather just
trying to get the job done with the best method available and/or with the best outcome.
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 23 2011, 07:04 AM)

....if the Ubuntu installer asks you:
- if it should install bootloader to the MBR, say NO. <<<*IT* never *asked* anything.
- if it should NOT install ANY bootloader say YES. <<<"Ditto" to #1.
- INSTEAD of the latter if it should install to the PBR or volume or bootsector or partition, say YES, it is good as well.
As stated in my "use
LESS
words and provide more DATA"
Post #43, I ended up using the "lesser of two evils" by allowing the boot loader to install with XP on NEW DISK ONLY.
QUOTE (jaclaz @ Jul 30 2011, 10:37 AM)

You don't mention WHAT/HOW/WHERE you installed UBUNTU, from what you write it seems like you installed it EXACTLY in the way that it was suggested you NOT to choose, i.e. installing GRUB2 to the MBR.
I can now expand on this topic and try to tell WHAT/HOW/WHERE I installed Ubuntu (although a peek at the screen pic may give you a hint

). According to my notes, here's what I did as *exactly* as is "
SB possible":
- Loaded Ubuntu installer CD
- Rebooted and CD executed "temporary" Ubuntu
- Chose to "install" Ubuntu
- Language
- Time Zone
- Keyboard Layout
- WHAT/HOW/WHERE to install? Manually...
- Create extended partition/volumes
- 1st ext2 volume -- 100MB "/boot"
- 2nd swap volume -- 2000MB "linux-swap"
- 3rd ext3 volume -- 15000MB "/" (or "/root")
- 4th FAT32 volume -- 5000MB "/windows"
- Name, rank and serial number
- Review of data before actual installation begins <<<Location of an "Advanced" button, I clicked this and now "Install boot loader" ticked off with a drop-down list
- Installation begins
- The final review is where I FINALLY found a reference to "boot loader" -- it was an "Advanced" button on the review screen. I tried to choose the Ubuntu volume(s), but IT wouldn't allow anything EXCEPT "/dev/sda" OR "/dev/sdb", so I chose "the lesser of two evils" and chose "/dev/sdb" even though I realized it would install on XP's MBR (or so I assumed), but I did NOT want it on Win 7's, so....see attached pic.
- Hit "Install Now" and there you have it. Checked all the possible boot combinations (with new disk connected; without new disk connected; thus my "excess-LESS data" post) and was all right with everything EXCEPT not getting past that particular XP splash screen.
QUOTE (SBernheart @ Jul 30 2011, 09:33 AM)

NOTE -- Included in the Ubuntu folders is one named "Windows" which was created as an afterthought as a 5GB FAT32 partition added after Ubuntu partitions were created. The installer didn't seem to appreciate my attempts at creating the Ubuntu partition as FAT32 stating, once again, "No root file system is defined. Correct from partitioning menu", so this was my *compromise* (for a lack of a better term). I can expand on this later. For now, my only concern is keeping the very "precious XP" as well as my Hub's Win 7 BOTH operational.
Rebooted to finally check on XP and from GRUB menu (yes, Ubuntu must have attached ALL disk
choices HERE as seen in pic), I *quickly* chose "XP" and after initial XP splash screen, it continued to the next screen (blue screen with another XP logo on it). It's the screen you'd see
before the logon screen (if you had one) and before you see your Desktop, but it doesn't go past this screen and instead, it appears to *hang* there. Had to power off....
At the risk of an even
longer post, I'll end this now. Take your time -- I'll be out for a few. If you have any questions/doubts/gripes/etc all will be addressed in the order in which they are received....
not.
SBernheart